New Delhi: The decision to bring down the number of centrally-sponsored schemes (CSS) to 30 from the current 72 may get delayed as differences have emerged among chief ministers on the final report of the sub-group under NITI Aayog.
The sub-group will meet again on September 4 to iron out the differences and finalise its report, which will be submitted to the Prime Minister.
"The chief minister's sub-group on CSS will meet on September 4. Some members of the panel refused to sign the final report and did not agree on certain recommendations," a source said.
The panel has recommended increasing the share of flexi funds to 25 percent from the current 10 percent.
The panel had met four times at an interval of almost one month. The last meeting was held on June 27 in Bhopal.
Then the panel's convener Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan had said: "There is a broad consensus on reducing the number of CSS and having two types of schemes. Some more suggestions have come... After seeking all chief ministers' consent on the draft, the final recommendations will be submitted to the Prime Minister."
The sub-group was constituted by the Prime Minister in March this year in pursuance of a decision taken in the first meeting of the governing council of NITI Aayog a month earlier.
At present, there are 72 CSS, including the six new ones introduced by the NDA government. During the UPA rule, the numbers of CSS were cut from 147 to 66.
Meanwhile, the Centre has decided to raise states' share in taxes to 42 percent from 32 percent, which means larger devolution.
According to Budget estimates, the devolution to the states would be Rs 5.24 lakh crore in 2015-16 as against Rs 3.38 lakh crore, as per revised estimates of 2014-15.
Besides, Rs 3.04 lakh crore would be transferred by way of grants and Plan transfers. Therefore, the total transfer to states will be about 62 percent of the total tax receipts this fiscal.
As per the government's fiscal policy strategy, over 30 CSS have been identified for transfer to states because expenditure on them has already been taken into account as state expenditure.
